May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?


May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?

Puff Bar is a superb alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into the mouth area, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.

Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco Juul Compatible Pods in to the marketplace.

Plus the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes that you can buy could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.

It appears that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.